相关学者

相关机构

The Impact of AI-Powered Alexa Assistant on Loneliness in Homebound Older Adults: A Pilot Study

The Impact of AI-Powered Alexa Assistant on Loneliness in Homebound Older Adults: A Pilot Study

ES评分0   

DOI 10.20900/agmr20250003
刊名
AGMR
年,卷(期) 2025, 7(1)
作者
作者单位

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas, KS 66160, USA ;
Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, School of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas, KS 66160, USA ;

摘要
Background: Loneliness and social isolation are significant public health concerns among homebound older adults, often exacerbated by limited mobility and chronic health conditions. This study evaluates the impact of Artificial intelligence (AI))-powered Alexa voice assistant Echo Show on loneliness in this vulnerable population. Methods: An observational study was conducted with 105 homebound older adults receiving home care services. Participants were provided with Amazon Alexa devices and followed for six months. Loneliness was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale-20. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression models were used to analyze changes in the loneliness score. Results: The mean age of 105 participants was 73.14 years (SD ± 6.56), with 78.1% female and 78.1% White. At baseline, 88.57% of participants reported moderate to severe loneliness, and 93.34% had mild to moderate depression. At six-month follow-up, significant improvements were observed: loneliness scores decreased from 47.343 to 36.474 (p < 0.001). Regression analysis confirmed the intervention’s significant positive effect on reducing loneliness (coefficient = −9.27, p < 0.001), even after controlling for demographic and health-related variables. Participants with congestive heart failure (CHF) reported lower loneliness scores than those without CHF (coefficient = −4.877, p = 0.022), an unexpected finding warranting further investigation. Conclusion: AI-powered voice assistants like Alexa Echo Show significantly reduce loneliness in homebound older adults. These findings highlight the potential of technology-based interventions to address social isolation and enhance the well-being of this population. Policymakers and healthcare providers should consider integrating voice assistants into Medicare and Medicaid home care services to improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Further research is needed to explore long-term effects and mechanisms of action.
Abstract
Background: Loneliness and social isolation are significant public health concerns among homebound older adults, often exacerbated by limited mobility and chronic health conditions. This study evaluates the impact of Artificial intelligence (AI))-powered Alexa voice assistant Echo Show on loneliness in this vulnerable population. Methods: An observational study was conducted with 105 homebound older adults receiving home care services. Participants were provided with Amazon Alexa devices and followed for six months. Loneliness was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale-20. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression models were used to analyze changes in the loneliness score. Results: The mean age of 105 participants was 73.14 years (SD ± 6.56), with 78.1% female and 78.1% White. At baseline, 88.57% of participants reported moderate to severe loneliness, and 93.34% had mild to moderate depression. At six-month follow-up, significant improvements were observed: loneliness scores decreased from 47.343 to 36.474 (p < 0.001). Regression analysis confirmed the intervention’s significant positive effect on reducing loneliness (coefficient = −9.27, p < 0.001), even after controlling for demographic and health-related variables. Participants with congestive heart failure (CHF) reported lower loneliness scores than those without CHF (coefficient = −4.877, p = 0.022), an unexpected finding warranting further investigation. Conclusion: AI-powered voice assistants like Alexa Echo Show significantly reduce loneliness in homebound older adults. These findings highlight the potential of technology-based interventions to address social isolation and enhance the well-being of this population. Policymakers and healthcare providers should consider integrating voice assistants into Medicare and Medicaid home care services to improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Further research is needed to explore long-term effects and mechanisms of action.
关键词
loneliness; homebound; older adult; voice assistant; Alexa Echo Show
KeyWord
loneliness; homebound; older adult; voice assistant; Alexa Echo Show
基金项目
页码 -
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献

1.Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(2):227-37.

2.Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S, Capitanio JP, Cole SW. The neuroendocrinology of social isolation. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:415-40.

3.Banerjee D, Rai M. Social isolation in COVID-19: The impact of loneliness. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66(6):525-7.

4.Cohen-Mansfield J, Perach R. Interventions for alleviating loneliness among older persons: A critical review. Am J Health Promot. 2015;29(3):109-25.

5.Gardiner C, Geldenhuys G, Gott M. Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: An integrative review. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26(2):147-57.

6.Pradhan A, Mehta K, Findlater L. "Accessibility came by accident": Use of voice-controlled intelligent personal assistants by people with disabilities. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems; 2018 Apr 21-26; Montreal, Canada. New York (US): Association for Computing Machinery; 2018. p. 1-13.

7.Kowalski J, Jaskulska A, Skorupska K, Abramczuk K, Biele C, Kopeć W, et al. Older adults and voice interaction: A pilot study with Google Home. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems; 2019 May 4-9; Glasgow Scotland, UK. New York (US): Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. p. 1-6.

8.Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66(1):20-40.

9.Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982;17(1):37-49.

10.Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727-36.

11.Laird NM, Ware JH. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982;38(4):963-74.

12.StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 18. College Station (US): StataCorp LLC; 2023.

13.Chen K, Chan AHS, Chan SC. The effectiveness of AI chatbots in reducing loneliness among older adults: A pilot study. J Aging Health. 2021;33(5–6):451-63.

14.Hoang P, King JA, Moore S, Moore K, Reich K, Sidhu H, et al. Interventions Associated With Reduced Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(10):e2236676.

15.Cudjoe TKM, Roth DL, Szanton SL, Wolff JL, Boyd CM, Thorpe RJ. The Epidemiology of Social Isolation: National Health and Aging Trends Study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020;75(1):107-13.

16.Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310-57.

17.Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):726-32.

18.Courtin E, Knapp M. Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(3):799-812.

19.Mitzner TL, Boron JB, Fausset CB, Adams AE, Charness N, Czaja SJ, et al. Older Adults Talk Technology: Technology Usage and Attitudes. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(6):1710-21.

20.Vaportzis E, Clausen MG, Gow AJ. Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting with Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1687.

21.Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000316.

22.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. Washington (US): National Academies Press; 2020.

23.AARP Public Policy Institute. Addressing social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Opportunities for healthcare systems. Available from: https://www.aarp.org/ppi/. Accessed on 10 Dec 2024.

24.Administration for Community Living. National Family Caregiver Support Program (NFCSP). Washington (US): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2023.

25.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Home & Community-Based Services 1915(c). Baltimore (US): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2023.

26.Federal Communications Commission. Lifeline Program for Low-Income Consumers. Washington (US): Federal Communications Commission; 2023.

27.Bickmore TW, Schulman D, Sidner C. Automated interventions for multiple health behaviors using conversational agents. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(2):142-8.

28.Sezgin E, Huang Y, Ramtekkar U, Lin S. Readiness for voice assistants to support healthcare delivery during a health crisis and pandemic. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:122.

  • 引用本文

Guoqing Chen*,Ryan Spaulding. The Impact of AI-Powered Alexa Assistant on Loneliness in Homebound Older Adults: A Pilot Study [J]. Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research. 2025; 7; (1). - .

  • 文献评论