相关学者
相关机构
Research Frontiers in the Era of Embedding Sustainability: Bringing Social and Environmental Systems to the Forefront
Research Frontiers in the Era of Embedding Sustainability: Bringing Social and Environmental Systems to the Forefront
ES评分0
| DOI | 10.20900/jsr20210010 |
| 刊名 |
JSR
|
| 年，卷(期) | 2021, 3(2) |
| 作者 |
|
| 作者单位 |
Center for Sustainable Business, New York University Stern, 44 West 4th Street, New York, NY 10012, USA ; |
| Abstract |
Background: Fifty years ago, Milton Friedman first published his famous article in the New York Times—“The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits”. We explore the evolution of an extensive field of business management research that for 50 years has been devoted to examining that proposition. Today we find researchers exploring how embedding sustainability in corporate operations and business models can yield multiple business and societal benefits such as improved employee engagement, supply chain management, and reduced pollution. Stronger corporate sustainability has the potential to drive better management and performance and, as such, is emerging as a significant body of research for academics and practitioners alike. Findings of this research are also important because they may influence many corporate leaders who currently believe that adopting sustainability measures is too costly (i.e., reduce profitability) and not mission critical. Research across the social, economic, political, and business disciplines has been quite siloed to date. Business and sustainability scholars are just beginning to help each other analyze whether and how businesses can deliver on their sustainability goals for people and Earth. Our analysis highlights key thematic areas of research in the business literature. We also explain the disciplinary differences in the meanings and measurement of fundamental ideas including the scope of “governance”, who counts as “stakeholders”, and what elements to consider in conceptualizing “systems” relevant to business and society. Our analysis identified major topical areas for future collaboration among the disciplines, and how recognizing the diverse understandings of key terms listed above may unlock new synergies among researchers. Methods: We apply a novel quantitative bibliometric network (an author citation network analysis), text analysis, and semantic network analysis of 65,000 academic articles on sustainability issues from 1960 to 2015. Results: Foundational concepts were formed around 1995, and by 2006 empirical studies helped shape the field. Early research explored corporate social responsibility approaches such as philanthropy, stakeholder capitalism, and corporate environmental impacts. Research today is focused on how sustainability is embedded into business operations and research on purely environmental issues or philanthropy has diminished. Sustainability is a cohesive area of research with four main dimensions and 12 sub-clusters of research: (1) Management dimension (leadership, global ethics, shared value sub-clusters); (2) Performance (environmental, social, and governance [ESG] impacts, organizational, financial); (3) Marketing (attitudes, employees, brand/reputation); and (4) Strategy (supply chains, competitive systems, creating value). Conclusions: Companies that embed a sustainability core to business strategy are likely to perform well due to consumer, supplier, and employee engagement, reduction of risk, and improved operational management, among other factors. However, holes remain in the research, and we suggest new frontiers for academics and practitioners. This requires prioritizing understanding human and environmental systems, rather than the firm as the focal point of research.
|
| KeyWord |
bibliometrics; CSR; ESG; embedded sustainability; corporate sustainability; sustainable finance; sustainable supply chains; stakeholder capitalism; conscious capitalism; impact investing; shared value; triple bottom line
|
| 基金项目 | |
| 页码 | - |
- 参考文献
- 相关文献
1.Van Holt T, Statler M, Atz U, Whelan T, van Loggerenberg M, Cebulla J. The cultural consensus of sustainability-driven innovation: Strategies for success. Bus Strateg Environ. 2020;29(8):3399-409.
2.Bansal P, Song HC. Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Acad Manag Ann. 2016;11(1):105-49.
3.Carley KM, Hummon NP, Harty M. Scientific influence- an analysis of themain path structure in the journal of conflict resolution. Knowledge-Creation Diffus Util. 1993;14(4):417-47.
4.van Eck NJ, Waltman L. CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. J Informetr. 2014;8(4):802-23.
5.Van Holt T, Johnson JC, Moates S, Carley KM. The role of datasets on scientific influence within conflict research. Du W-B, editor. PLoS One. 2016 Apr;11(4):e0154148.
6.van Eck NJ, Waltman L. CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. J Informetr. 2014;8(4):802-23.
7.Van Holt T, Johnson JCJC, Carley KM, Brinkley J, Diesner J. Rapid ethnographic assessment for cultural mapping. Poetics. 2013;41(4):366-83.
8.Carley KM, Columbus D, Landwehr P. Automap user’s guide 2013. Pittsburgh (PA, US): Tech. rep., CMUISR-CASOS; 2013.
9.Van Holt T, Johnson JC, Brinkley JD, Carley KM, Caspersen J. Structure of ethnic violence in Sudan: A semi-automated network analysis of online news (2003-2010). Comput Math Organ Theory. 2012;18(3):340-55.
10.Carley KM, Hummon NP, Harty M. Scientific Influence. Knowledge. 1993;14(4):417-47.
11.Friedman M. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago (IL, US): University of Chicago Press; 1962.
12.Campbell JL. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Source Acad Manag Rev Acad Manag Rev. 2007;32(3):946-67.
13.Ferrell OC, Gresham LG. A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. J Mark. 1985;49(3):87.
14.Fama EF, Jensen MC. Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ. 1983;26(2):301-25.
15.DiMaggio P, Powell W. The iron cage revisited. Am Soc Rev. 1983;48:147-160.
16.Donaldson T, Preston LE. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad Manag Rev. 1995;20(1):65-91.
17.Porter ME, Kramer MR. Creating shared value. Harv Bus Rev. 2011;89(1-2):62-77.
18.Porter ME, Kramer MR. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev. 2006;84(12):78-92,163.
19.Barnett ML. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev. 2007;32:794-816.
20.Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organ Stud. 2003;24(3):403-41.
21.Scherer AG, Palazzo G. Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a habermasian perspective. Acad Manag Rev. 2007;32:1096-120.
22.Scherer AG, Palazzo G. The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. J Manag Stud. 2011;48(4):899-931.
23.Matten D, Crane A. Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Acad Manag Rev. 2005;30(1):166-79.
24.Teegen H, Jonathan PD, Vachani S. The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda. J Int Bus Stud. 2004;35(6):463-83.
25.Doh JP, Guay TR. Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. J Manag Stud. 2006;43(1):47-74.
26.Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional pressures. Acad Manag Rev. 1991;16(1):145-79.
27.Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. 1st ed. Chicago (IL, US): University of Chicago Press; 1991.
28.Maak T, Pless NM. Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—A relational perspective. J Bus Ethics. 2006;66(1):99-115.
29.Waldman DA, Sully de Luque M, Washburn N, House RJ, Adetoun B, Barrasa A, et al. Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. J Int Bus Stud. 2006;37(6):823-37.
30.Jones TM. Ethical Decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Acad Manag Rev. 1991;16(2):366.
31.Trevino LK. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Acad Manag Rev. 1986;11(3):601.
32.Sen S, Bhattacharya CB, Korschun D. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. J Acad Mark Sci. 2006;34(2):158-66.
33.Becker-Olsen KL, Cudmore BA, Hill RP. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. J Bus Res. 2006;59(1):46-53.
34.Ellen PS, Mohr LA, Webb DJ. Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix? J Retail. 2000;76(3):393-406.
35.Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S. Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. Int J Res Mark. 2007;24(3):224-41.
36.Vlachos PA, Tsamakos A, Vrechopoulos AP, Avramidis PK. Corporate social responsibility: attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. J Acad Mark Sci. 2009;37(2):170-80.
37.Nan X, Heo K. Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. J Advert. 2007;36(2):63-74.
38.Aguilera R V, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 2007;32(3):836-63.
39.Klein J, Dawar N. Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. Int J Res Mark. 2004;21(3):203-17.
40.Hoeffler S, Keller KL. Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. J Public Policy Mark. 2002;21(1):78-89.
41.Bhattacharya CB, Sen S. Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. J Mark. 2003;67(2):76-88.
42.Varadarajan PR, Menon A. Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. J Mark. 1988;52(3):58.
43.Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A. The behavioral consequences of service quality. J Mark. 1996;60(2):31.
44.Keller KL. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J Mark. 1993;57(1):1.
45.Morgan RM, Hunt SD. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Mark. 1994;58(3):20.
46.Drumwright ME. Company advertising with a social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria. J Mark. 1996;60(4):71.
47.Strahilevitz M, Myers JG. Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. J Consum Res. 1998;24(4):434-46.
48.Sheth JN, Sethia NK, Srinivas S. Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. J Acad Mark Sci. 2011;39(1):21-39.
49.Peattie K, Peattie S. Social marketing: A pathway to consumption reduction? J Bus Res. 2009;62(2):260-8.
50.Luchs MG, Naylor RW, Irwin JR, Raghunathan R. The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. J Mark. 2010;74(5):18-31.
51.Vermeir I, Verbeke W. Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude—behavioral intention” gap. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2006;19(2):169-94.
52.Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Van den Bergh B. Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;98(3):392-404.
53.Kinnear TC, Taylor JR, Ahmed SA. Ecologically concerned consumers: Who are they? J Mark. 1974;38(2):20.
54.Menon A, Menon A. Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: The emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. J Mark. 1997;61(1):51.
55.Roberts JA. Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. J Bus Res. 1996;36(3):217-31.
56.Kalafatis SP, Pollard M, East R, Tsogas MH. Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: a cross‐market examination. J Consum Mark. 1999;16(5):441-60.
57.Laroche M, Bergeron J, Barbaro‐Forleo G. Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J Consum Mark. 2001;18(6):503-20.
58.Tanner C, Wölfing Kast S. Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychol Mark. 2003;20(10):883-902.
59.Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE. New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues. 2000;56(3):425-42.
60.Carrigan M, Attalla A. The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? J Consum Mark. 2001;18(7):560-78.
61.Maignan I, Ferrell O. Antecedents and benefits of corporate citizenship: An investigation of French businesses. J Bus Res. 2001;51(1):37-51.
62.Peterson DK. The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Bus Soc. 2004;43(3):296-319.
63.Brammer S, Millington A, Rayton B. The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2007;18(10):1701-19.
64.Kim H-R, Lee M, Lee H-T, Kim N-M. Corporate social responsibility and employee–company identification. J Bus Ethics. 2010;95(4):557-69.
65.Backhaus KB, Stone BA, Heiner K. Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Bus Soc. 2002;41(3):292-318.
66.Bhattacharya CB, Sen S, Korschun D. Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2008;49(2):37-44.
67.Greening DW, Turban DB. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus Soc. 2000;39(3):254-80.
68.Ashforth BE, Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Acad Manag Rev. 1989;14(1):20.
69.Mael F, Ashforth BE. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav. 1992;13(2):103-23.
70.Dutton JE, Dukerich JM, Harquail C V. Organizational images and member identification. Adm Sci Q. 1994;39(2):239.
71.Bear S, Rahman N, Post C. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J Bus Ethics. 2010;97(2):207-21.
72.Carter DA, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financ Rev. 2003;38(1):33-53.
73.Kim Y, Park MS, Wier B. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? Account Rev. 2012;87(3):761-96.
74.Cespa G, Cestone G. Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. J Econ Manag Strateg. 2007;16(3):741-71.
75.Fama EF. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J Polit Econ. 1980;88(2):288-307.
76.Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ. 1976;3(4):305-60.
77.Hillman AJ, Dalziel T. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Acad Manag Rev. 2003;28(3):383.
78.Shleifer A, Vishny RW. Large shareholders and corporate control. J Polit Econ. 1986;94(3, Part 1):461-88.
79.La Porta R, Lopez‐de‐Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW. Law and finance. J Polit Econ. 1998;106(6):1113-55.
80.Jensen MC, Jensen, Michael. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Am Econ Rev. 1986;76(2):323-9.
81.Gray R. The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society. Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Account Organ Soc. 2002;27(7):687-708.
82.Bebbington J, Larrinaga C, Moneva JM. Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Audit Account J. 2008;21(3):337-61.
83.Dhaliwal DS, Radhakrishnan S, Tsang A, Yang YG. Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Account Rev. 2012;87(3):723-59.
84.Al-Tuwaijri SA, Christensen TE, Hughes KE. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Account Organ Soc. 2004;29(5-6):447-71.
85.Adams CA. The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Account Audit Account J. 2004;17:731-57.
86.Cooper SM, Owen DL. Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Account Organ Soc. 2007;32(7-8):649-67.
87.Marx B, Dyk V Van. Sustainability reporting and assurance: An analysis of assurance practices in South Africa. Meditari Account Res. 2011;19(1/2):39-55.
88.O’Donovan G. Environmental disclosures in the annual report. Accounting, Audit Account J. 2002;15(3):344-71.
89.Deegan C. The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures—A theoretical foundation. Account Audit Account J. 2002;15(3):282-311.
90.Cormier D, Magnan M, Van Velthoven B. Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? Eur Account Rev. 2005;14(1):3-39.
91.Goss A, Roberts GS. The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Financ Times. 2009;35(7):1794-810.
92.Dhaliwal DS, Li OZ, Tsang A, Yang YG. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Account Rev. 2011;86(1):59-100.
93.Heinkel R, Kraus A, Zechner J. The effect of green investment on corporate behavior. J Financ Quant Anal. 2001;36(4):431-49.
94.El Ghoul S, Guedhami O, Kwok CCY, Mishra DR. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? J Bank Financ. 2011;35(9):2388-406.
95.Jo H, Harjoto M. Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics. 2011;103(3):351-83.
96.Statman M. Socially responsible mutual funds. Financ Anal J. 2000;56(3):30-9.
97.Derwall J, Guenster N, Bauer R, Koedijk K. The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financ Anal J. 2005;61(2):51-63.
98.Kempf A, Osthoff P. The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. Eur Financ Manag. 2007;13(5):908-22.
99.Bello ZY. Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification. J Financ Res. 2005;28(1):41-57.
100.Kreander N, Gray RH, Power DM, Sinclair CD. Evaluating the performance of ethical and non-ethical funds: A matched pair analysis. J Bus Financ Account. 2005;32(7-8):1465-93.
101.Bauer R, Koedijk K, Otten R. International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. J Bank Financ. 2005;29(7):1751-67.
102.Hamilton S, Jo H, Statman M. Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financ Anal J. 1993;49(6):62-6.
103.Renneboog L, Ter Horst J, Zhang C. Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. J Bank Financ. 2008;32(9):1723-42.
104.Brammer S, Brooks C, Pavelin S. Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financ Manag. 2006;35(3):97-116.
105.Barnett ML, Salomon RM. Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strateg Manag J. 2006;27(11):1101-22.
106.Chatterji AK, Levine DI, Toffel MW. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? J Econ Manag Strateg. 2009;18(1):125-69.
107.Carhart MM. On persistence in mutual fund performance. J Financ. 1997;52:57-82.
108.Fama EF, French KR. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J Financ Econ. 1993;33(1):3-56.
109.Mallin CA, Saadouni B, Briston RJ. The financial performance of ethical investment funds. J Bus Financ Account. 1995;22(4):483-96.
110.Etzion D. Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A Review. J Manage. 2007;33(4):637-64.
111.Ramus CA, Steger U. The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee "ecoinitiatives" at leading-edge european companies. Acad Manag J. 2000;43(4):605-26.
112.Delmas M, Toffel MW. Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Bus Strateg Environ. 2004;13(4):209-22.
113.Sharma S, Henriques I. Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strateg Manag J. 2005;26(2):159-80.
114.Christmann P. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Acad Manag J. 2000;43(4):663-80.
115.Stefan A, Paul L. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad Manag Perspect. 2008;22(4):45-62.
116.Hunt CB, Auster ER. Proactive environmental management: Avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Manage Rev. 1990;31:7-18.
117.Shrivastava P. Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strateg Manag J. 1995;16(S1):183-200.
118.Hart SI, Ahuja G. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus Strateg Environ. 1996;5(1996):30-7.
119.Schmidheiny S; World business council for sustainable development. changing course—A global business perspective on development and the environment. Cambridge (MA, US): The MIT Press; 1998.
120.Henriques I, Sadorsky P. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Acad Manag J. 1999;42(1):87-199.
121.Sharma S, Vredenburg H. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg Manag J. 1998;19(8):729-53.
122.Hart SL. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manag Rev. 1995;20(4):986.
123.Nidumolu R, Prahalad CK, Rangaswami MR. Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harv Bus Rev. 2009;87(9):57-64.
124.Epstein MJ, Buhovac AR. Making sustainability work 2nd edition: Best Practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. San Francisco (CA, US): Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2014.
125.Hart S, Milstein M. Creating sustainable value. Acad Manag Exec. 2003;17(2):56-69.
126.Hart SL, Sharma S. Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Acad Manag Exec. 2004;18(1):7-18.
127.Dyllick T, Hockerts K. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ. 2002;11(2):130-41.
128.Anderson LM, Bateman TS. Individual environmental initiative: championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Acad Manag J. 2000;43(4):548-70.
129.Bansal P. From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organ Sci. 2003;14(5):510-27.
130.Elkington J. Cannibals with forks: Triple bottom line 21st century. Hoboken (NJ, US): John Wiley & Son Ltd; 1999.
131.Shrivastava P. The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manag Rev. 1995;20(4):936.
132.Gladwin TN, Kennelly JJ, Krause T-S, Krause T-S. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Acad Manag Rev. 1995;20(4):874.
133.Seuring S, Müller M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J Clean Prod. 2008;16(15):1699-710.
134.Carter CR, Liane Easton P. Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag. 2011;41(1):46-62.
135.Handfield R, Sroufe R, Walton S. Integrating environmental management and supply chain strategies. Bus Strateg Environ. 2005;14(1):1-19.
136.Carter CR, Carter JR. Interorganizational determinants of environmental purchasing: Initial evidence from the consumer products industries. Decis Sci. 1998;29(3):659-84.
137.Carter CR, Kale R, Grimm CM. Environmental purchasing and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2000;36(3):219-28.
138.Darnall N, Jolley GJ, Handfield R. Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: complements for sustainability? Bus Strateg Environ. 2008;17(1):30-45.
139.Andersen M, Skjoett‐Larsen T. Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Lindgreen A, editor. Supply Chain Manag An Int J. 2009;14(2):75-86.
140.Linton JD, Klassen R, Jayaraman V. Sustainable supply chains: An introduction. J Oper Manag. 2007;25(6):1075-82.
141.Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai K. An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ. 2011;130(1):1-15.
142.Pagell M, Wu Z. Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. J Supply Chain Manag. 2009;45(2):37-56.
143.Geffen CA, Rothenberg S. Suppliers and environmental innovation. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2000;20(2):166-86.
144.Vachon S, Klassen RD. Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ. 2008;111(2):299-315.
145.Rao P, Holt D. Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2005;25(9):898-916.
146.Walker H, Di Sisto L, McBain D. Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: Lessons from the public and private sectors. J Purch Supply Manag. 2008;14(1):69-85.
147.Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Geng Y. Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2005;25(5):449-68.
148.Crona B, Käll S, van Holt T. Fishery Improvement Projects as a governance tool for fisheries sustainability: A global comparative analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223054.
149.Agrawal A. Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev. 2001;29(10):1649-72.
150.McCay BJ. ITQs and community: An essay on environmental governance. Agric Resour Econ Rev. 2004;33(2):162-70.
151.Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2015.
152.Bush SR, Oosterveer P, Bailey M, Mol APJ. Sustainability governance of chains and networks: A review and future outlook. J Clean Prod. 2015;107(16):8-19.
153.Van Holt T, Weisman W. Global production network mapping for transforming socio-ecological systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2016;20:61-6.
154.Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin E, et al. Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc. 2009;14(2):32.
155.Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc. 2010;15(4):20.
156.Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes, F Adaptive comanagement for builidng resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management. 2004;34:75-90.
157.Masterson VA, Vetter S, Chaigneau T, Daw TM, Selomane O, Hamann M, et al. Revisiting the relationships between human well-being and ecosystems in dynamic social-ecological systems: Implications for stewardship and development. Global Sustainability. 2019;2:e8.
158.van Holt T. Landscape influences on fisher success: Adaptation strategies in closed and open access fisheries in southern Chile. Ecol Soc. 2012;17(1):28.
159.Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn Psychol. 1973;5(2):207-32.
- 文献评论