相关学者
相关机构
A Review of Residential Buildings’ Sustainability Performance Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach
A Review of Residential Buildings’ Sustainability Performance Using a Life Cycle Assessment Approach
ES评分0
| DOI | 10.20900/jsr20190006 |
| 刊名 |
JSR
|
| 年，卷(期) | 2019, 1(1) |
| 作者 |
|
| 作者单位 |
1 School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, 6102, Australia; |
| Abstract |
Achieving sustainable buildings is a challenging task. Building sustainability involves “green building” design and construction, taking account of both environmental elements and economic benefits, along with social obligations to the society we live in. This article aims to critically review and analyse studies of the building and construction industry that deal with aspects of sustainability, including environmental life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, social life cycle assessment and cleaner production strategies, and to examine the research gaps in order to generate recommendations for further research. About 807 refereed research articles on residential buildings published over the last 10 years (2009–2019), were downloaded, having been searched from online databases (including Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect and Compendex) using keywords. Building materials, embodied energy and operating energy were found to contribute chiefly to the environmental and socio-economic objectives of the construction industry. Many studies covered only the life cycle tools (such as environmental life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, and social lifecycle assessment) used in the sustainability assessment process. The “carbon footprint” concept is the most commonly used indicator in building sustainability assessments, underlining the urgent need to deploy more diverse environmental impact categories in order to avoid trade-offs among environmental, social and economic objectives. The social life cycle assessment tool needs a methodological breakthrough to improve its application in the building industry. In most of the studies, only an approximate evaluation of buildings’ service life is the main consideration in life cycle assessments, while the important factor of the quality of the materials used in buildings is often neglected. However, a methodological approach to estimate the service life of structures that considers the durability of different building components would provide a more realistic life cycle assessment. Hence it would be judicious to address the thematic and methodological gaps identified in this paper, thereby optimising the understanding and communication of life cycle outcomes in building sustainability.
|
| KeyWord |
sustainability; life cycle assessment; building; sustainability indicators; service life
|
| 基金项目 | |
| 页码 | - |
- 参考文献
- 相关文献
1.Business Council for Sustainable Development; Deloitte & Touche; International Institute for Sustainable Development. Business strategy for sustainable development: leadership and accountability for the '90s. Winnipeg (Canada): International Institute for Sustainable Development; 1992.
2.Love PED, Irani Z. An exploratory study of information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of SMEs in the construction industry. Inf Manag. 2004;42(1):227-42.
3.Zuo J, Zhao ZY. Green building research current status and future agenda: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;30:271-81.
4.Ma M, Cai W. Do commercial building sector-derived carbon emissions decouple from the economic growth in Tertiary Industry? A case study of four municipalities in China. Sci Total Environ. 2019;560(1):822-34.
5.Dean B, Dulac J, Petrichenko K, Graham P. Towards zero-emission efficient and resilient buildings. Global Status Report 2016. Paris (France): Global Allience for Buildings and Construction (GABC); 2016.
6.Trimetric. Key Highlights from Global Construction Outlook 2021. London (UK): Construction Intelligence Centre, Timetric; 2018. Report Code: GD-CN0004GO.
7.United Nations Environment Programme. Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication-A synthesis for Policy Makers. St-Martin-Bellevue (France): United Nations Environment Programme; 2011. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/126GER_synthesisen.pdf. Accessed 2018 Dec 25.
8.Joseph P, Tretsiakova-McNally S. Sustainable Non-metallic Building Materials. Sustainability. 2010;2(2):400-27.
9.Pickin J, Randell P. National Waste report 2016. Victoria (Australia): Department of the Environment and Energy; 2017. Available from: https://www.environment.gov.au/protection/waste-resource-recovery/national-waste-reports/national-waste-report-2016. Accessed 2018 Dec 18.
10.Australian Bureau of Statics. Labour Force Region-SA4 Data. Canberra (Australia): Department of Jobs and Small Business—Australian Government; 2018. Available from: http://lmip.gov.au/default.aspx?LMIP/Downloads/ABSLabourForceRegion. Accessed 2019 Jan 16.
11.United Nations Environment Programme. Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. Making informed choices on Products. Paris (France): Life Cycle initiative; 2012. Available from: https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/starting-life-cycle-thinking/life-cycle-approaches/life-cycle-sustainability-assessment. Accessed 2018 Jun 30.
12.Committee on Climate Change. Fourth carbon budget review—part 2: the cost-effective path to the 2050 target. London (UK): Committee on Climate Change; 2013. Available from: https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/fourth-carbon-budget-review/. Accessed 2019 Jun 16.
13.Evangelista PPA, Kiperstock A, Torres EA, Gonçalves JP. Environmental performance analysis of residential buildings in Brazil using life cycle assessment (LCA). Constr Build Mater. 2018;169:748-61.
14.Lawania K, Biswas WK. Application of life cycle assessment approach to deliver low carbon houses at regional level in Western Australia. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2018;23:204-24.
15.Janjua SY, Sarker PK, Biswas WK. Impact of Service Life on the Environmental Performance of Buildings. Buidings. 2019;9:9. doi: 10.3390/buildings9010009
16.Lombard R. It’s not easy being green: Difficulties in sourcing sustainable building materials. QScience Connect. 2017;2:1. doi: https://doi.org/10.5339/
17.Hegger M, Drexler H, Zeumer M. Basics Materials. Basel (Switzerland): Birkhauser; 2007.
18.Ashby M, Johnson K. Materials and Design: the Art and Science of Material Selection in Product Design. 1st ed. Oxford (UK): Butterworth-Heinemann; 2002.
19.Crilly N, Moultrie J, Clarkson PJ. Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Des Stud. 2004;25(6):547-77.
20.Rao RV. A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;431(1-2):248-55.
21.Abeysundara UG, Babel S, Gheewala S. A matrix in life cycle perspective for selecting sustainable materials for buildings in Sri Lanka. Build Environ. 2009;44(5):997-1004.
22.Spiekermann C, Donath D. Digital support of material and product selection in the architectural design and planning process. In: Gürlebeck K, Könke C, editors. Proceeding of 17th International Conference on the Applications of Computer Science and Mathematics in Architecture and Civil Engineering; 2006 Jul 12-14; Weimar, Germany. Weimar (Germany): Bauhaus-University Weimar; 2006. p. 1-10.
23.Huang H, Zhang L, Liu Z, Sutherland JW. Multi-criteria decision making and uncertainty analysis for materials selection in environmentally conscious design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2011;52(5-8):421-32.
24.Cheng K, Hsu SC, Li WM, Ma HW. Quantifying potential anthropogenic resources of buildings through hot spot analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;133:10-20.
25.Iffa E, Tariku F. Hygrothermal performance assessment of ICF walls with different moisture control strategies and wall designs. J. Green Build. 2017;12(4):35-53.
26.Uçtuğ FG, Ağralı S. Simple nonlinear optimization-based selection of insulation material and window type in Turkey: effect of heating and cooling base temperatures. J Green Build. 2017;9(6):79-94.
27.Wang J, Pan W. Influencing parameters of the life cycle cost-energy relationship of buildings. J Green Build. 2018;13(4):103-21.
28.Ajayia S, Oyedele LO, Ilori OM. Changing significance of embodied energy: A comparative study of material specifications and building energy sources. J Build Eng. 2019;23:324-33.
29.De Luca P, Carbone I, Nagy JB. Green building materials: a review of state of the art studies of innovative materials. J Green Build. 2017;12(4):141-61.
30.Harish VSKV, Kumar A. A review on modeling and simulation of building energy systems. Renew Sust Ener Rev. 2016;56:1272-92.
31.Lawania K, Biswas WK. Achieving environmental friendly building envelope for Western Australia's housing sector: A life cycle assessment approach. Int J Sust Built Environ. 2016;5(2):210-24.
32.Pillai RG, Gettu R, Santhanam M, Rengaraju S, Basavaraj AS. Service life and life cycle assessment of reinforced concrete systems with limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Cem Concr Res. 2019;118:111-9.
33.Huang B, Chen Y, McDowall W, Türkeli S, Geng Y. Embodied GHG emissions of building materials in Shanghai. J Clean Prod. 2019;210:777-85.
34.Glover J, Whilte DO, Langrish TAG. Wood versus concrete and steel in house construction. J For. 2002;100(8):34-41.
35.Petrovic B, Myhren JA, Zhang X, Wallhagen M, Eriksson O. Life Cycle Assessment of Building Materials for a Single-family House in Sweden. Energy Procedia. 2019;158:3547-52.
36.Tettey UYA, Dodoo A, Gustavsson L. Effect of different frame materials on the primary energy use of a multi storey residential building in a life cycle perspective. Energy Build. 2019;185(15):259-71.
37.Göswein V, Goncalves AB, Silvestre JD, Freire F, Kurda R. Transportation matters—does it? GIS-based comparative environmental assessment of concrete mixes with cement, fly ash, natural and recycled aggregates. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;137:1-10.
38.Siddique R, Singh G, Belarbi R, Ait-Mokhtar K, Kunal. Comparative investigation on the influence of spent foundry sand as partial replacement of fine aggregates on the properties of two grades of concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2015;83:216-22.
39.Bhardwaj B, Kumar P. Waste foundry sand in concrete: A review. Constr Build Mater. 2017;156:661-74.
40.Nath P, Sarker PK. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Constr Build Mater. 2014;66:163-71.
41.Durgun MY, Sevinc AH. High temperature resistance of concretes with GGBFS, waste glass powder, and colemanite ore wastes after different cooling conditions. Constr Build Mater. 2019;196:66-81.
42.Wang Y, Suraneni P. Experimental methods to determine the feasibility of steel slag as supplementary cementitious materials. Constr Build Mater. 2019;204:458-67.
43.Guo Y, Xie J, Zhao J, Zuo K. Utilization of unprocessed steel slag as fine aggregate in normal- and high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2019;204:41-9.
44.Tripathi B, Misra A, Chaudhary S. Strength and abrasion characteristics of ISF slag concrete. J Mater Civ Eng. 2013;25(11):1611-8.
45.Lori AR, Hassani A, Sedghi R. Investigating the mechanical and hydraulic characteristics of pervious concrete containing copper slag as coarse aggregate. Constr Build Mater. 2019;197:130-42.
46.Prem PR, Verma M, Ambily PS. Sustainable cleaner production of concrete with high volume copper slag. J Clean Prod. 2018;193:43-58.
47.Abdulmatin A, Tangchirapat W, Jaturapitakkul C. An investigation of bottom ash as a pozzolanic material. Constr Build Mater. 2018;186:155-62.
48.Ghosh A, Ghosh A, Neogi S. Reuse of fly ash and bottom ash in mortars with improved thermal conductivity performance for buildings. Heliyon. 2018;4(11):e00934.
49.Nath P, Sarker PK, Biswas WK. Effect of fly ash on the service life, carbon footprint and embodied energy of high strength concrete in the marine environment. Energy Build. 2018;158:1694-702.
50.Tamimi A, Hassan NM, Fattah K, Talachi A. Performance of cementitious materials produced by incorporating surface treated multiwall carbon nanotubes and silica fume. Constr Build Mater. 2016;114:934-45.
51.Muthusamy K, Mirza J, Zamri NA, Hussin MW, Budiea AMA. Properties of high strength palm oil clinker lightweight concrete containing palm oil fuel ash in tropical climate. Constr Build Mater. 2018;199:163-77.
52.Qin L, Gao X, Chen T. Recycling of raw rice husk to manufacture magnesium oxysulfate cement based lightweight building materials. J Clean Prod. 2018;191:220-32.
53.Umasabor RI, Okovido JO. Fire resistance evaluation of rice husk ash concrete. Heliyon. 2018;4(12):e01035.
54.Danso H. Properties of Coconut, Oil Palm and Bagasse Fibres: As Potential Building Materials. Procedia Eng. 2017;200:1-9.
55.Langade S, Gilke N, Patil K. Bagasse Ash for Manufacturing Construction Products. Materials Today Proceedings. 2018;5(9):19954-62.
56.Saccani A, Manzi S, Lancellotti I, Lipparini L. Composites obtained by recycling carbon fibre/epoxy composite wastes in building materials. Constr Build Mater. 2019;204:296-302.
57.Gómez-Soberón JM, Cabrera-Covarrubias FG, Almaral-Sánchez JL, Gómez-Soberón MC. Fresh-State Properties of Mortars with Recycled Glass Aggregates: Global Unification of Behavior. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2018;2018:1386946. doi: 10.1155/2018/1386946
58.Mendivil-Escalante JM, Gómez-Soberón JM, Almaral-Sánchez JL, Cabrera-Covarrubias FG. Metamorphosis in the Porosity of Recycled Concretes Through the Use of a Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Additive. Correlations between the Porous Network and Concrete Properties. Materials. 2017;10:176.
59.Cabrera-Covarrubias FG, Gómez-Soberón JM, Almaral-Sánchez JL, Arredondo-Rea SP, Gómez-Soberón MC, Corral-Higuera R. An Experimental Study of Mortars with Recycled Ceramic Aggregates: Deduction and Prediction of the Stress-Strain. Materials. 2016;9(12):1029.
60.Lawania K, Sarker PK, Biswas WK. Global Warming Implications of the Use of By-Products and Recycled Materials in Western Australia’s Housing Sector. Materials. 2015;8(10):6909-25.
61.Ding T, Xiao J, Tam VWY. A closed-loop life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete utilization in China. Waste Manag. 2016;56:367-75.
62.Hossain MU, Poon CS, Lo IC, Cheng JP. Evaluation of environmental friendliness of concrete paving eco-blocks using LCA approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2016;21(1):70-84.
63.Braga AM, Silvestre JD, Brito JD. Compared environmental and economic impact from cradle to gate of concrete with natural and recycled coarse aggregates. J Clean Prod. 2017;162:529-43.
64.Yazdanbakhsh A, Bank LC, Baez T, Wernick I. Comparative LCA of concrete with natural and recycled coarse aggregate in the New York City area. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2018;23(6):1163-73.
65.Grant A, Ries R, Kibert C. Life cycle assessment and service life prediction: A case study of building envelope materials. J Ind Ecol. 2014;18(2):187-200.
66.Maslesa E, Jensen PA, Birkved M. Indicators for quantifying environmental building performance: A systematic literature review. J Build Eng. 2018;19:552-60.
67.Gray J, Isaacs N, Kernohan D, McIndoe G. Building Evaluation techniques. Baird G, editor. New York (US): McGraw-Hill Co. Inc.; 1995.
68.ISO 15686-2, Buildings and constructed assets—Service life Planning. Part-2: Service life prediction procedures. Geneva (Switzerland): International Standards Organisation; 2012.
69.Madrigal LO, Bretones JF, Lanzarote BS. Proposed method of estimating the service life of building envelopes. J Constr. 2015;14(1):60-88.
70.Emídio F, Brito JD, Gaspar PL, Silva A. Application of the factor method to the estimation of the service life of natural stone cladding. Constr Build Mater. 2014;66:484-93.
71.Souza J, Silva A, Brito JD, Bauer E. Service life prediction of ceramic tiling systems in Brasília-Brazil using the factor method. Constr Build Mater. 2018;192:38-49.
72.Lyu Y, Kim JH, Gu X. Developing methodology for service life prediction of PV materials: Quantitative effects of light intensity and wavelength on discoloration of a glass/EVA/PPE laminate. Solar Energy. 2018;174:515-26.
73.Ligotski R, Sager U, Schneiderwind U, Asbach C, Schmidt F. Prediction of VOC adsorption performance for estimation of service life of activated carbon based filter media for indoor air purification. Build Environ. 2019;149:146-56.
74.Prieto AJ, Silva A, Brito JD, Macías-Bernal JM, Alejandre FJ. Multiple linear regression and fuzzy logic models applied to the functional service life prediction of cultural heritage. J Cult Herit. 2017;27:20-35.
75.Rauf A, Crawford RH. The relationship between material service life and the life cycle energy of contemporary residential buildings in Australia. Arch Sci Rev. 2013;56(3):252-61.
76.Rauf A, Crawford RH. The Effect of Material Service Life on the Life Cycle Embodied Energy of Multi-Unit Residential Buildings. Paper presented at: World Sustainable Buildings WSB14 Conference; 2014 Oct 28-30; Barcelona, Spain.
77.Rauf A, Crawford RH. Building service life and its effect on the life cycle embodied energy of buildings. Energy. 2015;79:140-8.
78.Klöppfer W. Life Cycle Sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2008;13:89-95.
79.ISO 14040: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. Geneva (Switzerland): International Standards Organization; 2006.
80.Counsoli F, Allen D, Boustead I, Fava J, Franklin W, Jensen A. SETAC (Society) and LCA “Code of Practice” Workshop (1993: Sesimbra, Portugal) Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a "code of practice". 1st ed. Pensacola (US): Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC); 1993.
81.Guinee JB, Haes UD, Huppes G. Quantitative life cycle assessment of products: 1: goal definition and inventory. J Clean Prod. 1993;1(1):3-13.
82.Bekker PCF. A life cycle approach in building. Build Environ. 1982;17(1):3-13.
83.Coles RJ. Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems. Build Environ. 1998;34(3):335-48.
84.Fufa SM, Skaar C, Gradeci K, Labonnote N. Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of ventilated timber wall constructions based on parametric LCA. J Clean Prod. 2018;44:319-33.
85.Marjaba GE, Chidiac SE. Sustainability and resiliency metrics for buildings—Critical review. Build Environ. 2016;101:116-25.
86.Rakha T, Moss TW, Shin D. A decade analysis of residential LEED buildings market share in the United States: Trends for transitioning sustainable societies. Sustain Cities Soc. 2018;39:568-77.
87.Saldaña-Márquez H, Gómez-Soberón JM, Arredondo-Rea SP, Rosell-Balada G. The passivhaus standard in the mediterranean climate: Evaluation, comparison and profitability. J Green Build. 2015;10(4):55-72.
88.Saldaña-Márquez H, Gómez-Soberón JM, Arredondo-Rea SP, Gámez-García DC, Corral-Higuera R. Sustainable social housing: The comparison of the Mexican funding program for housing solutions and building sustainability rating systems. Build Environ. 2018;133:103-22.
89.Fouquet M, Levasseur A, Margni M, Lebert A, Lasvaux S, Souyri B, et al. Methodological challenges and developments in LCA of low energy buildings: Application to biogenic carbon and global warming assessment. Build Environ. 2015;90:51-9.
90.Motuziene V, Rogoža A, Lapinskiene V, Vilutiene T. Construction solutions for energy efficient single-family house based on its life cycle multi-criteria analysis: A case study. J Clean Prod. 2016;112:532-41.
91.Aneurin Grant RR. Impact of building service life models on life cycle assessment. Build Res Info. 2013;41(2):168-86.
92.Akadiri PO. Understanding barriers affecting the selection of sustainable materials in building projects. J Build Eng. 2015;4:86-93.
93.Ingrao C, Arcidiacono C, Bezama A, Ioppolo G, Schmid AG. Virtual Special Issue on sustainability issues of by-product and waste management systems to produce building material commodities. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2017;126:A4-5.
94.Gámez-García DC, Gómez-Soberón JM, Corral-Higuera R, Saldaña-Márquez H, Gómez-Soberón MC, Arredondo-Rea SP. A Cradle to Handover Life Cycle Assessment of External Walls: Choice of Materials and Prognosis of Elements. Sustainability. 2018;10(8):2748.
95.Maalouf C, Ingrao C, Scrucca F, Moussa T, Asdrubali F. An energy and carbon footprint assessment upon the usage of hemp-lime concrete and recycled-PET façades for office facilities in France and Italy. J Clean Prod. 2018;170:1640-53.
96.Intini F, Kühtz S. Recycling in buildings: an LCA case study of a thermal insulation panel made of polyester fiber, recycled from post-consumer PET bottles. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2011;16(4):306-15.
97.Schmidt M, Crawford RH. A framework for the integrated optimisation of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost of buildings. Energy Build. 2018;171:155-67.
98.Tam WV, Le KN, Tran CN, Wang JY. A review on contemporary computational programs for Building's life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions assessment: An empirical study in Australia. J Clean Prod. 2018;172:4220-30.
99.Martínez-Rocamora A, Solís-Guzmán J, Marrero M. LCA databases focused on construction materials: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;58:565-73.
100.Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, et al. The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2005;10(1):3-9.
101.Ecoinvent Centre. Ecoinvent Databases 2019. Available from: http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/database.html. Access 2019 Apr 28.
102.Thinkstep. GaBi Databases 2019. Available from: http://www.gabi-software.com/databases/gabi-databases/. Access 2019 Apr 28.
103.Crawford RH, Czerniakowski I, Fuller RJ. A comprehensive framework for assessing the life-cycle energy of building construction assemblies. Arch Sci Rev. 2010;53(3):288.
104.Blengini GA, Carlo TD. Energy-Saving policies and low-energy residential buildings: an LCA case study to support decision makers in Piedmont (Italy). Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010;15(7):652-65.
105.Vitale P, Arena N, Gregorio F, Arena U. Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building. Waste Manag. 2017;60:311-21.
106.Ghose A, Pizzol M, McLaren S. Consequential LCA modelling of building refurbishment in New Zealand—an evaluation of resource and waste management scenarios. J Clean Prod. 2017;165:119-33.
107.Zhou C, Dai X, Wang R, Huang J. Indicators for evaluating sustainable communities: A review. Acta Ecol Sin. 2011;31(16):4750-9.
108.Geng S, Wang Y, Zuo J, Zhou Z, Mao G. Building life cycle assessment research: A review by bibliometric analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;76:176-84.
109.Settanni E, Tassielli G, Notarnicola B. Life Cycle Costing (LCC). In: Spellerberg I, Fogel DS, Fredericks SE, Butler Harrington LM, editors. Berkshire ENCYCLOpaedia of SUSTainability 6/10: Measurements, Indicators, and Research Methods for Sustainability. Great Barrington (US): Berkshire Publishing Group; 2012. p. 225-7.
110.HuaGoh B, Sun Y. The development of life-cycle costing for buildings. Build Res Inf. 2016;44(3):319-33.
111.Lawania K, Biswas WK. Cost-effective GHG mitigation strategies for Western Australia’s housing sector: A life cycle management approach. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2016;18(8):2419-28.
112.Heijungs R, Settanni E, Guinée J. Toward a computational structure for life cycle sustainability analysis: Unifying LCA and LCC. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2012;18(9):1722-33.
113.Singh D, Tion RK. Development of life cycle costing framework for highway bridges in Myanmar. Int J Project Manag. 2005;23(1):37-44.
114.Cuellar-Franca RM, Azapagic A. Life cycle cost analysis of the UK housing stock. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2014;19:174-93.
115.Kovacic I, Waltenbereger L, Gourlis G. Tool for life cycle analysis of facade-systems for industrial buildings. J Clean Prod. 2016;130(1):260-72.
116.Azeem S, Naeem MA, Waheed A, Thaheem MJ. Examining barriers and measures to promote the adoption of green building practices in Pakistan. Smart Sustain Built Environ. 2017;6(3):86-100.
117.Persson J, Grönkvist S. Drivers for and barriers to low-energy buildings in Sweden. J Clean Prod. 2015;109:296-304.
118.Shen LY, Hao JL, Tam VW, Yao H. A checklist for assessing sustainability performance of construction projects. J Civil Eng Manag. 2007;13(4):273-81.
119.Ahmad T, Thaheem MJ. Economic sustainability assessment of residential buildings: A dedicated assessment framework and implications for BIM. Sustain Cities Soc. 2018;38:476-91.
120.Babaizadeh H, Haghighi N, Asadi A, Broun R, Riley D. Life cycle assessment of exterior window shadings in residential buildings in different climate zones. Build Environ. 2015;90:168-77.
121.Allacker K, Trigaux D, Troyer FD. An Approach For Handling Environmental And Economic Conflicts In The Context Of Sustainable Building. In: Passerini G, Brebbia CA, editors. Environ Impact II. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. Southampton (UK): WIT Press; 2014. p. 79-90.
122.Chiang YH, Li J, Zhou L, Wong FK, Lam PT. The nexus among employment opportunities, life-cycle costs, and carbon emissions: A case study of sustainable building maintenance in Hong Kong. J Clean Prod. 2015;109:326-35.
123.Dawood MH. BIM based optimal life cycle cost of sustainable house framework. In: Proceedings of 3rd MEC International Conference on Big Data and Smart City; 2016 Mar 15-16; Muscat, Oman. Piscataway (US): IEEE; 2016. doi: 10.1109/ICBDSC.2016.7460381
124.Sayed M, Sajid S, Sawant, Priyadarshi H. Financial feasibility analysis of water conservation components in mass housing projects: Suburban Indian Case review. J Arch Eng. 2016;22(2):e04016001-1.
125.Tam VWY, Senaratne S, Le KN, Shen LY, Perica J, Illankoon IMCS. Life-cycle cost analysis of green-building implementation using timber applications. J Clean Prod. 2017;147:458-69.
126.Yoshida J, Sugiura A. The Effects of Multiple Green Factors on Condominium Prices. J Real Estate Finan Econ. 2015;50(3):412-37.
127.Roh S, Tae S, Kim R. Development of a Streamlined Environmental Life Cycle Costing Model for Buildings in South Korea. Sustainability. 2018;10(6):1733.
128.O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R. Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA): approach and methodological development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1996;1(4):231-37.
129.United Nations Environment Programme. Guidlines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Paris (France): Life Cycle initiative, 2009. Available from: https://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/starting-life-cycle-thinking/life-cycle-approaches/social-lca. Accessed 2018 Jun 30.
130.Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G. Potential hotspots identified by social LCA - Part 1: A case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013;18(1):127-43.
131.Ekener E, Hansson J, Gustavsson M. Addressing positive impacts in social LCA discussing current and new approaches exemplified by the case of vehicle fuels. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2018;23(3):556-68.
132.Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A. Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: A case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2013;18(7):1386-92.
133.Lim CI, Biswas WK. An Evaluation of Holistic Sustainability Assessment Framework for Palm Oil Production in Malaysia. Sustainability. 2015;7:16561-7. doi: 10.3390/su71215833
134.Agyekum EO, Fortuin K, Harst ED. Environmental and social life cycle assessment of bamboo bicycle frames made in Ghana. J Clean Prod. 2017;143:1069-80.
135.Santos AC, mendes P, Teixeira MR. Social life cycle analysis as a tool for sustainable management of illegal waste dumping in municipal services. J Clean Prod. 2019;210:1141-9.
136.Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, et al. Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod. 2014;69:34-48.
137.Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA. Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2014;19(3):620-45.
138.Dong YH, Ng ST. A social life cycle assessment model for building construction in Hong Kong. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2015;20(8):1166-80.
139.Santos P, Pereira AC, Gervásio H, Bettencourt A, Mateus D. Assessment of health and comfort criteria in a life cycle social context: Application to buildings for higher education. J Clean Prod. 2017;123:625-48.
140.European Committee for Standardisation. EN 16309:2014+A1, Sustainability of Construction Works—Assessment of Social Performance of Buildings—Calculation Methodology. Brussels (Belgium): CEN—European Committee for Standardisation; 2014.
141.Liu S, Qian S. Evaluation of social life-cycle performance of buildings: Theoretical framework and impact assessment approach. J Clean Prod. 2019;213:792-807.
142.Mathe S. Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment. The SLCA participatory approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2014;19(8):1506-14.
143.Dong YH, Ng ST. A modeling framework to evaluate sustainability of building construction based on LCSA. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2016;21:555-68.
144.Fu F, Pan L, Ma L, Li Z. A simplified method to estimate the energy-saving potentials of frequent construction and demolition process in China. Energy. 2013;49:316-22.
145.Griggs D, Smith MS, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Öhman MC, Shyamsundar P, et al. Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature. 2013;495(7441):305-7.
146.Bragança L, Mateus R, Koukkari H. Building Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability. 2010;2:2101-23.
147.Alwaer H, Clements-Croome DJ. Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings. Build Environ. 2010;45(4):799-807.
148.Dale VH, Beyeler SC. Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Indic. 2001;1(1):3-10.
149.Lasvaux S, Achim F, Garat P, Peuportier B, Chevalier J, Habert G. Correlations in Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods (LCIA) and indicators for construction materials: what matters? Ecol Indic. 2016;67:174-82.
150.Kamali M, Hewage K, Milani AS. Life cycle sustainability performance assessment framework for residential modular buildings: Aggregated sustainability indices. Build Environ. 2018;138:21-41.
151.Onat NC, KucukvarM, Tatari O. Integrating triple bottom line input–output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2014;19:1488-505.
152.Balasbaneh AT, Bin Marsono AK, Kermanshahi KE. Balancing of life cycle carbon and cost appraisal on alternative wall and roof design verification for residential building. Constr Innovation. 2018;18(3):274-300.
153.Hossaini N, Reza B, Akhtar S, Sadiq R, Hewage K. AHP based life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework: a case study of six storey wood frame and concrete frame buildings in Vancouver. J Environ Plan Manag. 2015;58(7):1217-41.
- 文献评论